nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2023, 02, v.42;No.424 137-141+149
功能性消化不良中医证型分布及与十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞相关性研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2019YFC1710403
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.16295/j.cnki.0257-358x.2023.02.007
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的:探究功能性消化不良(FD)中医证型分布特点及与十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞(EOS)的相关性。方法:245例FD患者按中医证型分为脾虚气滞证、肝胃不和证、脾胃湿热证、脾胃虚寒证和寒热错杂证5组,并以46名健康体检者为对照组。记录患者的临床资料,内镜下取十二指肠球部组织,经苏木精-伊红染色后通过光学显微镜观察十二指肠EOS数量,分析FD中医证型分布规律及证型与十二指肠EOS的相关性。结果:(1)在245例FD患者中,肝胃不和证、脾虚气滞证为最常见的证型,其次为脾胃湿热证、脾胃虚寒证和寒热错杂证。FD患者不同亚型的中医证型分布存在差异(P<0.05),上腹痛综合征(EPS)以肝胃不和证最多见,餐后不适综合征(PDS)及EPS+PDS以脾虚气滞证多见。(2)FD不同证型间的十二指肠EOS数量差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),依次为脾胃湿热证(26.60±7.41)>肝胃不和证(24.71±6.17)>寒热错杂证(23.96±4.72)>脾胃虚寒证(21.94±6.40)>脾虚气滞证(21.92±5.85)。脾胃湿热证、肝胃不和证十二指肠EOS数量均高于脾虚气滞证和脾胃虚寒证(P<0.01或P<0.05)。(3)Pearson相关性分析结果表明,肝胃不和证、脾胃湿热证与十二指肠EOS数量均呈正相关(P<0.01)。结论:十二指肠EOS数量可作为FD的中医辨证分型参考指标。

Abstract:

Objective:To explore the distribution of functional dyspepsia(FD) traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome types and its correlation with eosinophils(EOS) in duodenum. Method:Total 245 patients with FD according to TCM syndrome types were divided into five types, syndrome of spleen-deficiency and qi stagnation,syndrome of incoordination between liver and stomach,syndrome of dampness-heat of spleen and stomach,syndrome of deficient cold of spleen and stomach,cold-heat complicated syndrome. Total 46 healthy volunteers was normal control group. Patients' clinical data was recorded. Endoscopic duodenal bulb organization were collected for HE staining. Eosinophils were counted,and their associations with clinical syndromes were analyzed. Results:(1)In 245 FD patients,syndrome of incoordination between liver and stomach,syndrome of spleen-deficiency and qi stagnation were the most common syndromes,followed by syndrome of dampness-heat of spleen and stomach,syndrome of deficient cold of spleen and stomach,cold-heat complicated syndrome. There were significantly statistical differences in the distribution of different TCM syndromes from different subtypes of FD patients(P<0.05). Most of patients with epigastric pain syndrome(EPS) were syndrome of incoordination between liver and stomach. Most patients of postprandial distress syndrome(PDS) or patients both EPS and PDS were syndrome of spleen-deficiency and qi stagnation.(2) The number of EOS between different FD syndromes was statistically significant different(P<0.01). The EOS quantity of syndrome of dampness-heat of spleen and stomach(26.60±7.41) was more than that syndrome of incoordination between liver and stomach(24.71 ±6.17),more than cold-heat complicated syndrome(23.96 ±4.72),more than syndrome of deficient cold of spleen and stomach( 21.94 ± 6.40), more than syndrome of spleen-deficiency and qi stagnation(21.92±5.85). The number of EOS in syndrome of dampness-heat of spleen and stomach and syndrome of incoordination between liver and stomach was significantly higher than that in syndrome of spleen-deficiency and qi stagnation and syndrome of deficient cold of spleen and stomach(P<0.01 or P<0.05).(3)Data from Pearson correlation analysis showed that syndrome of incoordination between liver and stomach,syndrome of dampness-heat of spleen and stomach,were positively correlated with EOS quantity in duodenum(P<0.01).Conclusion:The number of EOS in duodenum can be used as a reference index for TCM syndrome differentiation and classification of functional dyspepsia.

参考文献

[1] FORD A C,MAHADEVA S,CARBONE M F,et al. Functional dyspepsia[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10263):1689-1702.

[2] DROSSMAN D A,HASLER W L. Rome IV-functional GI disorders:disorders of gut-brain interaction[J]. Gastroenterology,2016,150(6):1257-1261.

[3]李军祥,陈誩,李岩.功能性消化不良中西医结合诊疗共识意见(2017年)[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2017,25(12):889-894.

[4] SAYUK G S, GYAWALI C P. Functional dyspepsia:diagnostic and therapeutic approaches[J]. Drugs,2020,80(13):1319-1336.

[5] WAUTERS L,TALLEY N J,WALKER M M,et al. Novel concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of functional dyspepsia[J]. Gut,2020,69(3):591-600.

[6] MOSHIREE B, TALLEY N J. Functional dyspepsia:a critical appraisal of the European consensus from a global perspective[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2021, 33(9):e14216.

[7] WAUTERS L,BURNS G,CEULEMANS M,et al. Duodenal inflammation:an emerging target for functional dyspepsia?[J]. Expert Opin Ther Targets,2020,24(6):511-523.

[8] PUTHANMADHOM NARAYANAN S,O’BRIEN D R,SHARMA M,et al. Duodenal mucosal barrier in functional dyspepsia[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2022,20(5):1019-1028.e3.

[9] MIWA H,NAGAHARA A,ASAKAWA A,et al. Evidencebased clinical practice guidelines for functional dyspepsia2021[J]. J Gastroenterol,2022,57(2):47-61.

[10] WAUTERS L, DICKMAN R, DRUG V, et al. United European Gastroenterology(UEG)and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility(ESNM)consensus on functional dyspepsia[J]. United European Gastroenterol J,2021,9(3):307-331.

[11]张声生,赵鲁卿.功能性消化不良中医诊疗专家共识意见(2017)[J].中华中医药杂志,2017,32(6):2595-2598.

[12]郑筱萸.中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2002:134-139.

[13]田德禄.中医内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:177-190.

[14] WUESTENBERGHS F,MELCHIOR C,DESPREZ C,et al.Sleep quality and insomnia are associated with quality of life in functional dyspepsia[J]. Front Neurosci,2022,16:829916.

[15]刘文杰.功能性消化不良中医证型分布特点研究及刘华一教授辨治经验撷英[D].天津:天津中医药大学,2021.

[16]任小军.功能性消化不良不同亚型中医证型分布研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆医科大学,2020.

[17] HUANG X, OSHIMA T, AKIBA Y, et al. Duodenal cholinergic tuft cell number is increased in functional dyspepsia[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil,2022,34(10):e14378.

[18] SARKAR M A M, AKHTER S, KHAN M R, et al.Association of duodenal eosinophilia with Helicobacter pylori-negative functional dyspepsia[J]. Arab J Gastroenterol,2020,21(1):19-23.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16295/j.cnki.0257-358x.2023.02.007

中图分类号:R259

引用信息:

[1]雷雪,王再见,李会霞,等.功能性消化不良中医证型分布及与十二指肠嗜酸性粒细胞相关性研究[J],2023,42(02):137-141+149.DOI:10.16295/j.cnki.0257-358x.2023.02.007.

基金信息:

国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2019YFC1710403

检 索 高级检索